On the other hand, no one rather tries to convince people to watching the TV. Even though there are more and more possibilities, people can watch tv on live, choose satellite TV or remain with traditional option. All we hear is how the TV is bed for young people, middle age people, and older as well. But if asked what is good about the TV, what would one say?
Basically, there are numerous things to consider. In the theory, it shouldn't be problematical to answer why it can be profitable to watch tv on live. At first, we get an access to the newest information presented in an easily understandable way. News services and redactors from all over the world do their best to deliver the most timely reports from everywhere where there something interesting is occurring.
At second, there is nothing more efficiently broadening one's horizons than watching international TV.
By choosing channels streamed from abroad, we can improve foreign language, learn about another culture, and check out what's important in other countries. It can be not only useful, but also very interesting. At third, if we watch tv on live, we can choose from truly wide offer of channels.
As a result, we're not constrained on waiting for the repetition if we missed a thing. If there is an interesting film, we don't need to wait forever till the public television displays it. We can watch any of private channels instead and watch the movie right after it's produced.
At forth, if there's a thing not presented by any of popular TV channels, we can try to search for it among less common channels. With quite a wide choice, we might easily happen to find what we've been looking for. And what's quite interesting, though, it the fact that none of these arguments is enough to counteract the weight of priceless "TV is bad for eyesight".
About the Author: